Cosmic Origins and Interdimensional Physics

The entirety of the whole reflected through every individual part, the entirety of existence taking upon every possible manifestation in this eternal moment of now.

Each of our 5 basic senses detect different dimensional states of the physical universe.

The Chakras System also articulates different dimensional states of the physical universe and operates in systems of detection expressed through sensation.

Numerals are the building blocks of the Universe. 

The stars and galaxies beyond reflect our cosmic origins and our story through the universe.

The entirety of the whole reflected through every individual part, the structuring of the universe. 

Whenever we are speaking of the Numeral 1, we are physically speaking of a single point in space (·). The Numeral 1 is an esoteric representation of the physical identity of (·).  One is the beginning, the starting point of Numerical Replication. 

Equational Sequence: Additive Identity

Spiritual Significance: The Singularity From Which We All Come

Numerology Traits: Pioneer, Ambition, Courage, Individuality, Identity, Unity 

Existence of an Additive Identity

a + 0 = 0 + a = a;

a

The Existence of an additive Identity expresses the existence of Numerals within a Function. This equation expresses the esoteric symbolism of the Numeral 1, the existence of a Numerical Identity. The Numeral 1 is the emergence of something out of nothing, and in this sense, always holds a direct connection with the nothing from which it comes; 0 = 1. The Numeral 1 also references the existence of an Identity emerging from the nothing; a ± 0 = ±a, a being representation of an identity within the equation. When referencing the origin, Identity emerges and this is the Additive Identity within an Equation System. The Additive Identity enables proof of each Numeral's Identity within an Equation.  

 When the Numeral 1 Individualizes from itself, the Numeral 2 is created. When we state that 1 + 1 = 2, we are articulating the creation of (:). First there was (·). Now there is (:). (·) and (·) become (:) when we group them together as (·). 

Existence of Additive Inverse

a + (-a) = (-a) + a = 0;

a = a

There are  two sides to an equation, this quality of mathematics represents the Numeral 2's formation. The Existence of an Additive Inverse denotes the equational function of duality inherent to numerical nature. it is in this same core conceptualization in which the esoteric symbolism of 2 arises; two numerals which are inherently the same, but operating on opposite polarities, enabling the existence of both of their distinct operations within an Equational Singularity.

 When we are looking at the Numeral 2 (:), we are also looking at The  Numerals 1 + 1. Our mind can identify (:) as the singular unit of 2  and/or two multiple units of 1. In order for 1 (·)  + 1 (·)  to equal 2 (:), the hidden process of addition is involved; which is  apparent in the algebraic expression of this function but an invisible  factor when visually looking at the photonic expression of (:). When Two  Numerals come together as One, a new Numeral is created (this physical  and mathematical phenomena is what is referred to in the Sacred Texts as  the Holy Trinity). Separately we have (·) and (·) but when we unify these individual points into a singular whole, we now gain (:). When we look at the expression of (:), there are actually 3 distinct  integers we are looking at, which is abundantly apparent in the  algebraic expression of 1 + 1 = 2, yet operates as a hidden dimensional  component when only looking at (:). (:) = 1 + 1 and (:) = 2, in this  capacity, 1 + 1 = 2. If both 1 + 1 and the Numeral 2 exist  simultaneously, then Numeral 3 must also exist; from this property of  Numerals, the existence of 1 + 1 = 2 (:) proves the existence of the Numeral 3 (·:). 

Associative Law of Addition

a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c;

0

The Associative Law of Addition describes how numerals associate with one-another in equational functions; the basic functioning relationship between all numerical sequences. The relation, in and of itself, is a hidden identity within numeral sequencing; it is in this relational identity in which all equational systems (of functioning origin) centralize their construction through the Numeral 3.

 Continuing down this same train of logic, the Numeral 4  inherently comes into existence. When we are looking at the expression  of (:), we are looking at (:) = 1 + 1 and simultaneously looking at (:) =  2; this is why 1 + 1 = 2, because 1 + 1 = (:) = 2. When we visually and  algebraically display this as 1 (·)  + 1(·) = 2 (:), the Numeral 4 is created; 1(·) + 1 (·)  = 1(·) + 1 (·). 

Commutative Law For Addition

a + b = b + a;

0 = a + (-a) + b + (-b)

The Commutative Law For Addition articulates the mannerism in which the rearrangement of numerals operate within functioning systems of an equation. Numerals can be substituted within systems of equal exchange, enabling a variety of expressions within a singular equation.  In this same capacity, so too do all numerals arise from the individualization of 1. The configuration of the individual distinction between numerals within an equation express the various polarities centering itself in relation to the same singularity (the unification of the equation as a whole). Each distinct polarity can be rearranged  into functioning configurations of the same origin expression, without corrupting the relation of the polarization of each individualization within the equation. 

  When looking at (:), the Numeral identity of 3 is hidden within the  process of distinguishing the Numeral 1 into the Numeral 2. This third  integer identity is clearly displayed in the equational identity of this  same function 2 = 1 + 1. Just as within visual expression (:), there is  a hidden algebraic dimension of mathematics (1+1=2) operating  underneath, revealing deeper levels to the surface reality; there are  also additional hidden dimensions beneath the algebraic expression of  Numeral Identity. We know that (:) inherently expresses 3 distinct  integers, two 1's and one 2, because of it's algebraic expression 1 + 1 =  2, in which we can clearly see this. The relational signs used in  algebraic sequencing are articulating numerical expressions which are  occurring on a deeper numerical dimension operating beneath the functions  of algebraic expression. I do not fully know what this deeper hidden  dimension is, but it is clear that it exists as it is through the  existence of this hidden dimension beneath algebraic expression in which  the Numeral 5 comes into existence. When we process the existence of 3  directly from (:), we are taking into account that 1 and 1 are 2  Numerals and 2 Numerals coming together creates 1 Numeral. This is done  when we identify the significance of 3 Numerals within the 1 + 1 = 2  algebraic equation, identifying the Numerical Integers operating in  relation to the primary function. When we look at the Numeral 2  visually, we see (:). When we look at the Numeral 2 algebraically, we  see 1 + 1 = 2, now viewing 3 (·:) integers where before there were only 2 (:). When we fuse algebraic and visual sequencing together, 1(·) + 1(·) = 2 (:) or 1(·) + 1(·) = 1(·) + 1(·);  we now obtain 4 integers (·:·) where there were originally only 2 (:).  These additional integers express hidden dimensions operating in  relation to (:). The significance of hidden dimensions of relation are  expressed through the relational symbols ( +, -, = , / , x , ....)  within algebraic equations. When we expand our awareness of the equation  1 + 1 = 2 into composites of a system, each individual symbol within an  equation holds the significance of an individual integer value within  the equation. This creates the Numeral 5 (:·:) within the equation 2 = 1  + 1.  When we state that (:) = (·) + (·), we are also stating that (:) = (:); this also expresses the system ( : > · < : ). The system ( :> ·<  : ) expresses the relational identity of 1 + 1 = 2. In order for 1 + 1 =  2 to be a valid equation, (:) must be greater than (·) and (·) must  also be less than (:), also expressed as the system ( : > · < : ) and/or the Numeral (:·:). 

Associative Law for Multiplication

a x (b x c) = (a x b) x c;

1

Base Equation; 1+1=2

When taking relation into relation, we find the Numeral 5 hidden within the base equation 1+1=2, and simultaneously comprise the functioning association of multiplication. When we take this conceptualization and form it into an equation, The Associative Law of Multiplication comes into formation.

The Associative Law for Multiplication comes into existence through centralization (of awareness) towards numerical reference based upon symbolic caricatures, recognizing the phonic symbol (in and of itself) as a numerical reference, The Associative Law for Addition comes forth through establishment of relational configuration within an equation. The relational configuration between numerals within an equation establishes the individualization of each numeral into a distinctive formation. From this basic establishment, the Numeral 3 naturally comes into configuration from identifying the individual numerals within the equation 1+1=2. When we take the application of relational configuration within the equation a step further, now counting the relational configuration in reference to their individual symbolic representation, the Numeral 5 naturally appears. In this same sense, the Associative Law for Multiplication naturally comes forth through the individualization of the symbolic representation of the relation between numerals within this equation (1+1=2); articulating the conceptualization of the association inherent to multiplication. Numerals, in and of themselves, express a symbolic reference, and in application of the conceptualization of symbolic references within an equation (including those which connect numerals in relation), we engage in the numerical sequencing of multiplication; which is in fact the same as the Numeral 5's individualization. Within addition, We add a numeral in relation to another numeral; within multiplication, we add a numeral in relation to itself. The relation of addition within multiplication is reflected back at the numeral in a multiplicative location, adding a second dimension of relation within the equation in which the numeral sequences itself (each with it's own distinct harmonization).

 When we identify (:), we simultaneously identify that (·) = (·), (:) = (:), (·) + (·) = (:), (·) - (·) = ( ),   (·) - (·)  =   (·) - (·),   and (·) + (·) = (·) + (·). In order to identify that (:) = (:), we must inherently acknowledge that (·) + (·) = (·) + (·). If   ( :> · <  : ) and (·) + (·) = (:), then the process of acquiring (:) from (·) +  (·) is the mathematical sequencing of (·) into (:). The sequencing of  (·) + (·) operating inherently within the structure of (:) leaves to  consequence that (:) = (:) and ( :  ≥  : ≤ : ). The equation 1 + 1 = 1 + 1 is a  distinctive equation from 1 + 1 = 2 because 1 + 1 = 1 + 1 articulates  the additive functions with the system while 1 + 1 = 2 articulates the  singularity of the system as a whole; all taking place within the  processing of (:). Within the function of 1 + 1 = 1 + 1 (the equation  expressing the additive properties of the system), the existence of a  multiplicative identity is also being expressed. On a visual level;

 ( 1 +  1 )  ≠  ( 2 ). 

On a visual level;

 ( 1 + 1 ) = ( 1 + 1 )

 this is the existence  of the multiplicative identity being visually revealed through algebraic  expression(s), the identity of the Numeral 6 (:::). The detection of  the Numeral 6 within this specific equation is the algebraic expression  of a hidden mathematical dimension operating beneath the system(s) of  all equation(s).  

Existence of a Multiplicative Identity

a + 0

ll 

a x 1 = 1 x a 

 ll  

      a       

; a  

The Existence of an Additive Identity proves the existence of a numeral's identity.

a + 0 = 0 + a

II

a x 1 = 1 x a

ll

a = a

The multiplicative identity is displayed within the self-replication properties that a is exhibiting within this equation. The additive identity is displayed through the existence of a while the additive inverse is displayed by the existence of a within an equation format (creating the existence of -a). When we take this a step further, into the Existence of a Multiplicative Identity, a=a is identified within the self-replicating properties a is displaying through it's equalized existence on both sides of a unified equation. A polarity is inherently established through the individualization of the Numeral 1 from itself, creating an inherent polarity of a singular region of space expressing itself through two distinct regions of space operating in mutual unison with their singular origin. In this process, addition and multiplication are naturally created . When these two polarities of singularity (:) expand their dimensional perimeters again, the two poles of a singular origin replicate into two sets of two poles (‧ : ‧), each distinguishable from each-other by operating in two dimensions of directions of the same singular space. Through this process, multiplication is created.

 1 + 1 = 1 + 1

There is a very big significance  between using the equal sign as an individual integer and choosing to  leave it as a neutral party, equivalent to mathematics which uses the  Numerical Symbol of 0 and mathematics that doesn't use the Numerical  Symbol of 0. When we acknowledge an integer value, we hold its placement  within the equation as an equivalence of 1. When we give an Integer  Value the value of 1 (within the equation's matrix), we state that this  integer is something and thus a part of the equation.The Numeral 1  enables any Integer, and Integer relation, to be operating in placement  within the Equation's Identity.. The Equal Sign (=) within an equation  represents the point of Equilibrium, also referred to as the Numerical  Equilibrium of 0; the equilibrium of an equation is referencing that the  net-force of all directions (of the equation) is 0 (in equilirbium).  When we give the Equilibrium the Integer Value of 1, we are now placing  an Integer Value to the Equilibrium and creating the system 0 = 1.   I believe this sequencing of Numerals within Equations is the Binary  Sequencing being represented within all equations, the base sequencing  operating from equating two domains with one-another; Base 2 (Numeral  Theory).  

Comprehending 0 = 1;

Foundations of 0's and 1's relation to one-another:

Algebraic Relation:

       1 = 1

       II

1 + - 1 = 0

Numerical Chronology:                                                                                     ...  -9  -8  -7  -6  -5  -4  -3  -2  -1   0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  ... 

             or  

                                                            ...  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  2  1  0  1  2  3  4   5  6  7  8  9  ...

The  reason why this equation is such a big deal is because 0 is the only  Numerical Figure which can be added into any equation without changing  the equation's Numerical Identity. This is because when we add 0 into  any equation, we are numerically referencing the nothingness in which  something arises so nothing is being added into the equation and thus  the equation remains the same. 0 is the nothingness which All Something  arises from and this is why any Numeral can be added into an equation as  long as it is added to both sides of the equation,thus adding 0  (Nothing) to the equation. On dimensions of physics, this relation can  be interpreted in similitude with a particle's relation to the emptiness  of space in which it arises and subsides. This point of nothingness is  that which all something arises, and it is this physical point in which  the Numeral 0 Symbolizes. This same Nothingness in which All Something  arises is Symbolized in the Sacred Texts as Allah; The Source. Allah is  revealed through every level of Existence (and Beyond). Allah is more  than belief, Allah is directly revealed through every level of the  Physical Universe (and Beyond). In Mathematics, Allah is Symbolized and  directly referenced as 0 and/or (=). It's been said that Quantum  Physicists have discovered that within the Emptiness of Space, so much  energy is contained, it could easily wipe out and/or create all matter  within the Physical Universe. I believe the release of this energy  within the very fabric of space-time is a Big Bang and this process of  the Creation of Something out of Nothing is what is Mathematically  Symbolized as 0 = 1; the entirety of the whole is reflected through  every individual point.

This  equation can also be expressed as; 0 + 1 - 1 = 0, from nothing we arise  and to the nothing we return. Numerical Identity comes into Existence  with the Numeral 1. Equational Identity comes into Existence with the  Numeral 2. It is in recognizing that something equals itself in which  the basis of an equation is created, 1 = 1. The statement of 1 = 1 can  also be referenced as (·) = (·), referencing two identical yet distinct  points, each distinguishable from each-other through a polarity in  relation. The relational signs within an equation are polarity signs;  Positive (+), Negative (-), and Neutral (=).

Now  that we have established a greater foundation to what is being  referenced through the Numerical Identity of 0 and 1, we can identify  the equational identity of 0 = 1. This equation is expressing the  equational system of Base 2 Numeral Expressions. In binary coding, the  only Numerals which are used are 0 and 1, and through the use of these  Two Numerals, any other equational system of any Base Numeral Sequencing  can be expressed. When operating within Base 2 Equational Systems, the  relation of nothing to something is in operation through the system of 0  = 1. When we are speaking of integer relations within equations, I am  referencing a Base 1 Sequencing of equations through various patterning  formats, each expressing different aspects of the equation. When we are  referencing domain sequencing relating to the sides of the equation, we  are referencing a Base 2 sequencing. All Numerical Base Sequencing are  interwoven within all Equations and Systems. Within the Integer  Sequencing of any equation, once we reference the Equilibrium as an  Integer of 1, the Equational System moves from a Base 1 into Base 2.

 1 + 1 = 1 + 1

 II

  (·)  +  (·) =  (·)  +  (·)

  (·) ( ) (·) ( ) (·) (  ) (·)

Existence of a Multiplicative Inverse

     a x a^-1 = a^-1 x a = 1

I

I   I

I         I

I         1         I

I            II            I

I   a x a^-1 = a^-1 x a   I

I            II            I

      I  a/a = 1        I     

 I      II        I

I  1 = 1   I

I      I

I

  1/1 = a/a

Any numeral divided by itself is equivalent to any other numeral divided by itself, all of them equivalent to the equation 1/1=a/a; when a ≠ 0. The Numeral 6 (The Existence of a Multiplicative Identity) comes into formation through the existence of two sets of two polarities, operating in two distinct dimensions (of space) in relation to a singularity. When we take into account the singularity in which the multiplication of two is operating in relation to, the Numeral 7 naturally comes into formation through the hidden equilibrium binding multiplicative replication. When we take into account the singular origin in which multiplicative replication is taking place, The Existence Of A Multiplicative Inverse stares us dead in the face. 

0

II

0 = 0

II

a + (-a) = 0          

ll

a = a

ll

a/a = 1     

II

a x a^-1 = a^-1 x a

ll

1 = 1

II

1

The Additive Identity gives way for the formation of 0, as the Multiplicative Identity gives way for the formation of 1.

All equational identities express binary sequencing, capable of reverting into ether a 0 or 1 depending on whether each side of the equation is ether completely multiplied or completely added with the other side.

  The Existence  of a Multiplicative Inverse gives ways for fractions, irrational numerals, power functions, and numerical equations to be formed.  

The sign for long division is the inverse (upon the vertical axis) of the phonic symbol of the Numeral 7 ( /‾‾ ). The regular division sign contains a horizontal line with a dot below and above it.  The division sign divides two points (÷); creating an equilibrium through fractioning a singular integer into two separate integers, connecting the two integers together in quantitative relation of the denomination, creating a singular integer through the form of an equation. When we divide into two individual points, with each point representing an individual integer, each individual integer operating in an individual dimension of perimeter, all in relation to a singular configure; the Numeral 7 naturally forms as  it's own distinctive figure.